@pipeworx/court-listener
Connect: https://pipeworx.io/mcp — every tool in the catalog, including @pipeworx/court-listener’s. Install: one-click buttons
Connect to just the @pipeworx/court-listener pack
https://gateway.pipeworx.io/court-listener/mcp — only @pipeworx/court-listener’s own tools, nothing else in the catalog.
No MCP client? Skip the connection: POST https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/search_packs {"query":"..."} to find a tool below, GET /v1/tools/<name> for its schema, POST the same URL with arguments for the data — see For AI agents.
Tools: 11
US court opinions from Free Law Project’s CourtListener: 8.3 million opinions across 3,361 courts, going back to 1761. The largest free, structured database of American case law.
Most of it is state law. That surprises people, and it is the point:
| Opinions | Share | |
|---|---|---|
| State (supreme, appellate, trial) | 6,219,869 | 71% |
| Federal (incl. SCOTUS 498,145) | 2,440,856 | 28% |
| Territorial, military, tribal | 86,691 | 1% |
Federal appellate law is easy to find elsewhere. Six million state opinions, assembled and addressable, are not.
Auth
None for case lookup and opinion text — no key, no signup, no rate limit.
search_opinions and search_dockets search upstream by topic and are subject
to CourtListener’s throttling. A free token from Free Law Project lifts it.
find_case_patents optionally uses a USPTO Open Data Portal platform key (the
same one the patents pack uses) to attach patent metadata — it returns the
asserted patent numbers either way, just without titles/dates when no key is
configured.
Tools
| Tool | Use it when |
|---|---|
find_case | You know what the case is called — “Roe v. Wade”, or just “Sullivan” |
lookup_citation | You have a reporter citation — “410 U.S. 113” |
list_case_opinions | You have a case and want its majority, concurrences and dissents |
get_opinion | You have an opinion id and want the full text |
search_opinions | Case search by name, judge or category (mirror-first; a specific court code searches live) |
search_dockets | Docket-level search, upstream |
list_docket_filings | You have a docket_id and want the docket sheet — what was filed, when |
get_docket_filing | You have a document_id and want that one filing + its PDF |
search_court_filings | You want the text of filings — motions, briefs, orders — not opinions |
find_case_patents | Patent case → its asserted patent numbers (with USPTO metadata) → its defendants, in one call |
For litigation documents the path is search_dockets → list_docket_filings →
get_docket_filing. Every filing tool is keyed by docket_id, and only
search_dockets produces one — a PACER case number will not resolve.
find_case_patents — patent litigation cross-reference
Joins a RECAP docket (Free Law Project / CourtListener) to patent metadata
(U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Open Data Portal). Pass a case_name
(optionally with court) or a docket_id already known from search_dockets:
{"case_name": "TurboCode LLC v. Quectel Wireless Solutions", "court": "txed"}
returns the docket, the plaintiff(s) and defendant(s) read off the case
caption, and every patent number that appears in the docket’s own filing
text, each one naming the filing it was found in and the exact label that
preceded it (e.g. "United States Patent No."). When a USPTO platform key is
configured (the same PLATFORM_USPTO_KEY the patents pack uses), each
number carries title, status, grant date and first inventor; without one the
number is still returned, with metadata_unavailable_reason saying why.
Thin cross-reference, by design — this never buys a PACER document.
Patent numbers come only from text RECAP already indexes: the clerk’s own
docket-entry descriptions (an exhibit filed as “United States Patent No.
6,813,742” reads straight off the entry, no purchase needed) and the text
excerpt of any document someone else has already bought from PACER. A
patent asserted only inside an unpurchased complaint PDF will not surface —
the response says how many filings it scanned and that a pdf_available
document was never fetched, rather than claiming completeness.
Extraction is conservative on purpose: a number only counts as an asserted
patent when the literal word “Patent” immediately precedes “No./Nos./Number(s)”
in the source text — a filing fee, a receipt number, a PageID or an attachment
index sitting nearby never matches just because it is a number near a number.
Defendants come from the case caption CourtListener indexed (not an
authenticated PACER party table), split on ";" / " and " only — never a
bare comma, since a corporate suffix (“Co., Ltd”, “Inc.,”) routinely contains
one and splitting on it would cut a single defendant’s name in two. An “et
al.” caption is reported as defendants_truncated: true rather than silently
dropped.
Opinions and filings answer different questions: an opinion is what a court decided, a filing is what the parties filed.
search_opinions returns one cases shape whichever path served it (mirror or
live), and the most-cited case inlines an excerpt of its lead opinion — the
opening, its holding language, and the query match — so “what did the court
hold” is answerable from the search result alone; get_opinion reads the full
text.
The usual path is find_case → list_case_opinions → get_opinion. Results
from find_case and lookup_citation are ranked by citation count, because
among cases sharing a name the one later courts actually cite is nearly always
the one being asked about — “roe wade” returns the 1973 Supreme Court decision
(5,581 citations) ahead of the 1970 district case (53).
Abbreviated and copy-pasted case names
Name matching is AND over every token, so one token the corpus does not carry
sinks the whole lookup. That used to mean find_case returned nothing for
Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly — the corpus stores “Bell Atlantic Corp.”, and
atl does not stem to atlant — and nothing for a name pasted out of a brief
with its scaffold attached (TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Bowers v. Hardwick).
When the name as given matches nothing, find_case now retries once with
Bluebook abbreviations, citation scaffold and corporate suffixes dropped
(never expanded or guessed — under AND semantics dropping a token can only
widen). A result found that way is labelled:
{ "matched": "relaxed", "matched_query": "Bell v Twombly", "note": "…" }
Treat a matched: "relaxed" hit as a best-effort resolution of a messy
citation and check the returned case_name is the case you meant. An exact
match never carries the field, and a name that matches on the first pass still
costs exactly one query.
Coverage
Keyless: opinion full text, case names, filing dates, judges, precedential status, citation counts, reporter citations.
Upstream, throttled: full-text topic search, and all three filing tools. Finding a case by topic can fail in a way that finding it by name or citation cannot.
RECAP filings (PACER documents) — keyless, via search only. ~9.7 million
documents. The REST endpoints you would reach for, /recap-documents/ and
/docket-entries/, both answer “Authentication credentials were not
provided”; /search/?type=rd needs no token and is the path the filing tools
use. Scoping goes through the q field query (q=docket_id:71886217) — passing
?docket_id= as a parameter is silently ignored and returns the whole
61.7M-document corpus rather than an error.
Caveats worth passing to a user
- A filing without a PDF is still a real filing. RECAP holds docket text
for far more entries than it holds documents, because a PDF only exists once
somebody has paid PACER for it. Each filing reports
pdf_available; on a typical docket most entries are metadata-only. Read a missing PDF as “nobody has bought this one”, never as “this was not filed”. - Filing tools spend a scarce budget. They go upstream to CourtListener’s
/search/, throttled to roughly 125 requests a day without a token — the same throttle the opinion mirror exists to avoid. There is no mirror for RECAP. When it is exhausted the tools say so explicitly rather than returning an empty docket; opinion tools are unaffected. - Recency. Responses carry a
snapshot_date; opinions filed after it fall through to upstream search. - 14.2% of the corpus is OCR of scanned volumes and reads accordingly.
Responses set
extracted_by_ocrso garbled text is attributable to the scan rather than to us. date_createdis not a filing date. It is when the record entered CourtListener — a 1946 opinion can read 2020.date_filed, joined from the cluster, is when the court actually ruled.- Citation counts are within CourtListener’s corpus, not a universal measure of importance.
Attribution
Data is CourtListener / Free Law Project, published under the Public Domain Mark. Free Law Project funds and maintains the corpus. If this pack is useful to you, https://free.law/donate/ is where that goes.
find_case_patents’ patent metadata is the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s
Open Data Portal — a US government work, public domain.
Tools
- search_opinions — US court opinions matching a keyword search, from CourtListener’s 8.3 million opinions across state and federal courts.
- search_dockets — US federal court dockets matching a keyword search, from the PACER/RECAP archive.
- search_case_law — US court opinions matching a full-text subject search, from CourtListener’s 8.3 million opinions.
- find_case — A US court case’s citations, filing date and judges, found by case name, from CourtListener.
- lookup_citation — The case a US reporter citation (e.g. “410 U.S. 113”) refers to, from CourtListener.
- list_case_opinions — Every opinion filed in one US court case — majority, concurrences, dissents — from CourtListener.
- get_opinion — The full text of one US court opinion by its CourtListener id.
- list_docket_filings — Every filing on one US federal court docket, in filing order, from the PACER/RECAP archive.
- get_docket_filing — One filing from a US federal court docket, by its RECAP document id.
- search_court_filings — US federal court filings — complaints, motions, orders — matching a text search, from PACER/RECAP.
- find_case_patents — A named patent-infringement case joined to its asserted patent numbers (with USPTO metadata) and its defendants.
Tools
find_case— A US court case's citations, filing date and judges, found by case name, from CourtListener.find_case_patents— A named patent-infringement case joined to its asserted patent numbers (with USPTO metadata) and its defendants.get_docket_filing— One filing from a US federal court docket, by its RECAP document id.get_opinion— The full text of one US court opinion by its CourtListener id.list_case_opinions— Every opinion filed in one US court case — majority, concurrences, dissents — from CourtListener.list_docket_filings— Every filing on one US federal court docket, in filing order, from the PACER/RECAP archive.lookup_citation— The case a US reporter citation (e.g. 410 U.S. 113 ) refers to, from CourtListener.search_case_law— US court opinions matching a full-text subject search, from CourtListener's 8.3 million opinions.search_court_filings— US federal court filings — complaints, motions, orders — matching a text search, from PACER/RECAP.search_dockets— US federal court dockets matching a keyword search, from the PACER/RECAP archive.search_opinions— US court opinions matching a keyword search, from CourtListener's 8.3 million opinions across state and federal courts.